Intrinsically Safe vs Explosion Proof

Intrinsically Safe vs Explosion Proof

Created by: Glen Zhu | Updated Date: January 22nd, 2025

Intrinsically Safe vs Explosion Proof

Safety is a top priority for almost every industry, especially for those dealing with hazardous and volatile environments.

When it comes to the safe operation of electronic instruments and equipment, two terms that are often used interchangeably are intrinsically safe and explosion proof.

Although these terms may seem similar, they have different meanings and purposes.

In this article, we’ll explore the difference between intrinsically safe and explosion proof devices.

The Role of Safety Devices in Hazardous Environments

Industries such as petroleum, chemical, and mining rely heavily on electrical and electronic equipment to carry out daily operations.

These environments are also prone to explosions that put personnel, property, and the environment at risk.

To manage these risks, intrinsically safe and explosion proof devices have been developed for use in such areas.

However, the difference between these two safety mechanisms is not always clear.

This article explores the differences between intrinsically safe and explosion proof devices.

What Are Intrinsically Safe Devices?

Intrinsically safe electronics are designed in such a way that they do not generate heat, spark, or any other form of ignition.

The term “intrinsically safe” refers to a type of protection technique specifically used to manage extremely hazardous environments.

Intrinsically safe equipment ensures that any potential electrical or thermal energy that could ignite flammable gases, vapors, or dust is kept below levels where ignition could occur.

Additionally, the equipment is protected from overvoltages and currents that might be present in the power source.

Design and Safety Features of Intrinsically Safe Devices

Intrinsically safe devices require special components that enable them to operate within safety parameters.

These components limit the current and voltage to a level that is incapable of igniting the hazardous surroundings.

To achieve this level of safety, intrinsically safe devices are often designed to use low power levels and high resistance elements.

These safety features protect the device and operator from the hazard they’re working in.

Explosion Proof Devices: Containing the Ignition

Explosion proof devices, on the other hand, protect electrical equipment from potential explosions by restricting any sparks that might ignite flammable substances in hazardous locations.

Explosion proof devices are specifically designed to contain an internal explosion, preventing it from spreading beyond the device.

They are commonly used when the hazardous environment is too explosive, such that it’s just too difficult to control by design.

How Explosion Proof Devices Work

Explosion proof enclosures have been tested to withstand the pressure and contain flames or arcs that may occur inside.

Explosion proof devices are good at stopping the spread of ignition, but they don’t necessarily guarantee that there will never be an explosion.

An explosion proof device is designed with a sturdy enclosure that can withstand an explosion on the inside without transmitting the explosion or flames to the external environment.

Flame Proof Devices: A Similar Safety Term

Another term used similarly to explosion proof and intrinsically safe is flame-proof.

Flame-proof refers to a type of protection used to protect against explosions, but unlike both intrinsically safe and explosion proof devices, flame-proof is designed to contain an explosion within the equipment.

In other words, the equipment can withstand an internal explosion, but it may not reduce the energy level of the ignition or spark that may cause the explosion.

Key Differences Between Intrinsically Safe, Explosion Proof, and Flame Proof Devices

The biggest difference between an intrinsically safe device and explosion proof or flame-proof devices is that intrinsically safe devices prevent ignition altogether.

They never exceed safe levels of current or voltage in the electrical circuit.

Explosion proof devices are designed to contain the ignition, whereas flame-proof devices are designed to contain the explosion.

Intrinsically safe devices will stop an explosion from occurring in the first place.

Choosing Between Intrinsically Safe and Explosion Proof Devices

When working in hazardous environments, there are several risks that need to be considered before choosing between intrinsically safe or explosion proof devices.

In such scenes, even a small spark can set off a massive explosion or fire, putting all those in the vicinity in danger.

Suitability of Intrinsically Safe Devices for Hazardous Areas

Intrinsically safe devices are best suited to hazardous areas where electrical equipment could generate a spark or heat that could ignite flammable gases or vapors.

The devices that operate under these conditions must never generate sparking or thermal energy and have to conform to strict certification requirements.

Such intricate components make them costly and low in power output.

Suitability of Explosion Proof Devices for Hazardous Areas

Explosion proof devices are better suited to hazardous areas where the flammable substance is present in the atmosphere at a concentration too high for intrinsically safe devices to handle.

Even though these devices are less expensive than intrinsically safe equipment, they are relatively bulky and less powerful in output, making them less efficient.

Choosing the Right Safety Mechanism

While both intrinsically safe and explosion proof devices protect personnel and equipment from potential danger, they differ in their design and intended purpose.

Intrinsically safe devices prevent ignition or avoid generating a spark or thermal energy altogether, while explosion proof devices are focused on preventing ignition from spreading.

In addition, flame-proof devices are designed to contain the explosion within the device or equipment.

Considerations for Safety Device Selection

Understanding the differences between these devices can help companies choose the most suitable protection technique for their hazardous environment.

It is important to research your environment and the type of protection required before purchasing intrinsically safe or explosion proof devices.

Intrinsically Safe vs Explosion Proof

“Intrinsically Safe” and “Explosion Proof” are two distinct protection methods used in hazardous environments to prevent explosions or other safety risks. Here’s a comparison to clarify the differences and use cases:

1. Definition

Intrinsically Safe (IS):

Equipment and wiring are designed to limit electrical and thermal energy to a level incapable of causing ignition in hazardous environments, even in the presence of a fault.

Explosion Proof (XP):

Equipment is enclosed in a robust housing designed to contain any explosion that might occur within the device, preventing ignition of the surrounding hazardous atmosphere.

2. Protection Method

Intrinsically Safe:

Prevents ignition by controlling the energy (voltage/current) to remain below the threshold needed to ignite hazardous substances.

Explosion Proof:

Contains the explosion within the enclosure and ensures that escaping gases or sparks do not ignite the external atmosphere.

3. Design and Components

Intrinsically Safe:

  • Uses low-energy circuits.
  • Requires components like zener barriers or isolators to limit current and voltage.
  • Ensures safety even with equipment faults.

Explosion Proof:

  • Heavy-duty enclosures made of materials like cast aluminum or stainless steel.
  • Gaskets and threaded joints to withstand internal explosions and pressure.

4. Installation and Maintenance

Intrinsically Safe:

  • Easier to install and maintain due to lighter designs.
  • Less expensive since it often eliminates the need for heavy enclosures.
  • Requires careful design, such as limiting power in circuits.

Explosion Proof:

  • More challenging to install and maintain due to bulky, heavy enclosures.
  • Higher installation cost because of the need for sealed conduit systems.

5. Applications

Intrinsically Safe:

  • Preferred for low-power devices like sensors, transmitters, and communication equipment.
  • Ideal for environments like oil refineries, gas plants, and chemical facilities.

Explosion Proof:

  • Suitable for high-power equipment like motors, junction boxes, and lighting systems.
  • Common in industries like mining, drilling rigs, and grain processing plants

6. Key Standards

Intrinsically Safe:

  • Standards: IEC/EN 60079-11, ANSI/UL 60079-11.
  • Focuses on circuit energy limitations.

Explosion Proof:

  • Standards: IEC/EN 60079-1, ANSI/UL 1203.
  • Emphasizes enclosure strength and flame paths.

7. Pros and Cons

Feature

Intrinsically Safe

Explosion Proof

Weight

Lightweight

Heavy-duty

Cost

Lower initial cost

Higher due to robust materials

Fault Tolerance

Safe even in equipment failure

Relies on containment integrity

Power

Limited to low-power systems

Can handle high-power equipment

Conclusion

Choose Intrinsically Safe

When dealing with low-power applications where energy limitation is feasible, and lightweight, cost-effective solutions are preferred.

Choose Explosion Proof

For high-power equipment and when durability and containment of potential internal explosions are critical.

Table of Contents

Reliability in surge protection!

LSP’s reliable surge protection devices (SPDs) are designed to meet the protection needs of installations against lightning and surges. Contact our Experts!

Request a Quote